Tier T2 · Usage & adoption · roadmap
Workload: how evenly is the book carried?
Open matters (phase != Closed) per matter-owner fee earner. Fee-earners are anonymised; this is about the shape of the load, not who carries it.
How to read this page
What this measures
How open matters are distributed across fee-earners, with concentration measured by a Gini coefficient and the busiest-decile share.
How to read it
The chart shows each fee-earner decile's share of open matters, busiest first. A steep left edge means the load is concentrated.
Why it matters
Concentration is a capacity and key-person risk, and it shapes who feels the pain of any process change.
Watch for
The fee-earner count spans history, so it includes departed staff; and entity-resolution duplicates can inflate the long tail.
0.819Gini coefficient
77%Held by busiest 10%
120Fee earners with open matters
4,002Busiest owner's matters
The evidence
Share of open matters held by each fee-earner decile, busiest first. D1 is the top 10% of fee-earners by matter count.
The busiest tenth of fee-earners hold this share of all open matters.
Read honestly: the concentration (Gini and top-10% share) is the durable signal. The raw fee-earner count is not current headcount; it spans the full history and includes departed staff, and duplicate parties can inflate the tail.
From the live engagement
The live engagement showed the same shape you see here: the top decile of fee-earners held a disproportionate share of the open book, measured with the identical Gini and top-decile-share method, anonymised to the shape of the load, never to who carries it.
roadmap On our roadmap: this lens is proven on a live client engagement and is being generalised into the productised pipeline (alongside Configuration and Lifecycle, which are shipped today). The numbers on this page are real, computed directly from the synthetic corpus, but the lens is not yet a formal, re-runnable step in
insights.audit.Continue the reportNext: Delta →